I know from your studies that the Bible teaches God is sovereign in the salvation of humanity, but where do free will teachers find Biblical support for their views?
"Free will" theology is the view that faith in the Gospel is a matter of personal choice unrelated to the work of God in the heart. Free will believes that nothing is required to cause faith in the Gospel other than a person's choice to believe.
This is not the teaching of the Bible. Apart from Adam and Woman (and Christ), no human being has been born with a truly free will. On the contrary, Paul says all men since Adam are born ensalved to sin and cannot choose nor please God by their fallen nature. At the moment the Lord acts to bring faith, the person is born again by the Spirit and is made a slave to Christ. [For helpful background on what the Bible teaches concerning saving faith, please read Wrestling With God.]
Our prideful nature assumes (and prefers to believe) that we played a part, however small, in our own salvation. We point to our decision to believe in the Gospel as the moment we "chose" Christ, yet the Bible says plainly that He chose us:
The false teaching that salvation is a product of man's "free" will is nothing new within the Church. Even in Paul's day men were confused and misled over the origins of their faith and the manner of salvation.
For example, Paul's first letter to the church in Corinth begins with a teaching on the sovereignty of God in choosing believers from among the lessor classes of society to shame the strong and powerful. Paul wrote this chapter to dispell the myth in Corinth that men were coming to faith in the Lord because of their associations with the "right" teacher (i.e., Paul vs. Apollos), which was a type of free will heresy:
Notice Paul says in v.30 that the believers in Corinth were "in Christ Jesus" (i.e., they were believers) not because of Paul's doing or even their own free will, but by "His doing" they were believers. It was Christ's doing that caused the men in Corinth to accept the Gospel. Their faith was not a result of each man's own will; it came as a matter of God's will.
Paul taught this same principle in Romans, when he says:
In the context of Romans 9, Paul is talking about how men receive God's mercy. Paul says God's mercy doesn't depend on a man's will, nor does it depend on how a man "runs," which refers to his life's works. Rather, it depends entirely on God, the One Who extends mercy according to His will.
Furthermore, Paul taught the church in Corinth that men are not naturally reception to the Gospel message:
Men do not accept the Gospel by their will because our fallen nature is spiritually opposed to God and therefore can never seek for God:
Since men lack the capacity to seek God and accept the Gospel, God must initiate faith in the heart to bring men to Himself, as Paul explains in Ephesians:
We can only assume this false doctrine (like all false teashing) originated with Satan, since "free will" salvation is a teaching that mirrors the first lie told in the Garden. Just as Woman and Adam were called to "be like God" and to determine the course of their own future independent of God's will, likewise the enemy is determined to corrupt the Church with a message of self-reliance and independence from God, even in the matter of grace and salvation.
Many Biblical references are cited by those advocating free will salvation, but these citations are always taken out of context, misinterpreted and misapplied. We could show many examples, but let's examine one of the most common. John 3:16 is commonly cited as "proof" of free will salvation and the opportunity for every person to believe if they choose:
To the ears of a free will advocate, Jesus seems to be saying that salvation is equally possible for every person, but this interpretation does not fit Jesus' words, especially in the context of John 3 overall. In 3:16 Jesus declares that the means of salvation is belief in Him, and the outcome of belief is eternal life, so that anyone who takes the step of belief will be saved.
Free will teachers have made the (false) assumption that Jesus was defining who could be saved (i.e., everyone has equal opportunity to believe), but in reality Jesus was speaking only about the manner of salvation (i.e., salvation is by faith in Christ). Jesus' statement has nothing to teach regarding who might be inclined toward saving faith.
In fact if we simply read a little further in the same chapter, we can see clearly Jesus teaching that saving faith is a consequence of God's choice not man's will. Two verses later, Jesus states that if saving faith is evident in a person's heart, it is evidence that God has chosen to open the heart and appoint the person to faith. But when faith does not come, it is evidence that the person has been judged by God already:
Notice that Jesus expands on His comments in John 3:16 by reminding us that those who do not accept the opportunity to believe and be saved are showing evidence that they have been "judged already" by God. According to Jesus, the inclination to believe (or not believe) was a reflection of the Father's sovereign will for that individual.
We could point to numerous other scripture references commonly cited to support free will teaching and uncover in a similar fashion how each is misapplied and misinterpreted out of context to support a free will viewpoint, but time does not permit such an exhaustive examination. We trust the Holy Spirit will reveal the truth of these matters to you in the course of your personal studies.
To fully appreciate this difficult topic, we highly recommend you listen to our Romans Bible study, where Paul deals with these issues in detail.